Target 10,000+ North Carolina Trend-Setters
Your business could be seen right here by local NC customers.
Advertise With Usby Anne Blythe, North Carolina Well being Information
November 17, 2025
By Anne Blythe
A New Bern eye surgeon who’s challenging North Carolina’s laws that cap the sorts of medical companies, amenities and gear that may be supplied in geographic areas of the state will take his case again to courtroom this week.
Jay Singleton, proprietor of Singleton Vision Center has been combating for 5 and a half years to upend how well being care industries have performed enterprise on this state for practically half a century.
The ophthalmologist filed a lawsuit in April 2020; it argues that North Carolina’s Certificate of Need statute, or CON legislation, is unconstitutional.
The law requires nursing properties, surgical facilities exterior hospital settings, hospitals, ambulatory most cancers care and cardiac facilities, substance use remedy beds, hospice and different amenities to acquire a certificates from the state Division of Well being and Human Companies earlier than growing or providing the companies.
Adopted in 1977 and amended over time, the legislation was established as a part of a nationwide effort launched within the mid-Twentieth century to comprise well being care prices by lowering over-investment in amenities and gear. The idea on the time was that states would forestall pointless capital expenditures by requiring certificates of want for the event of issues like medical companies, hospital beds, imaging machines and different high-priced gear.
Singleton contends that North Carolina’s legislation restricts his proper to earn a dwelling and to reap the complete fruits of his labor. He additionally asserts that the CON system violates the anti-monopoly clause of the state structure and grants particular benefits to current well being care amenities with out giving broad consideration to the general public good.
Singleton Imaginative and prescient Heart is “a full-service eye clinic” in New Bern. For years, in line with Singleton’s lawsuit, he has needed to carry out surgical procedures for all his sufferers on the clinic, which he contends might save them “hundreds of {dollars} over the price of acquiring these procedures at close by hospitals.”
The State Medical Facilities Plan, which is developed annually as a part of the certificates of want course of, discovered no such want existed in Singleton’s geographical area, which spans Craven, Jones and Pamlico counties. Actually, The Washington Post reported early this 12 months that regulators haven’t seen a necessity for brand new surgical facilities inside an 1,800-square-mile space of New Bern since at the very least 2007. So Singleton needed to carry out most of his surgical procedures on the hospital that’s simply two miles from his clinic.
Singleton’s attorneys argued that had the ophthalmologist been permitted to run such a program, he would have been capable of present “high-quality outpatient eye surgical procedures in line with the usual of care,” and supply it at a extra inexpensive charge than the hospital.
Singleton’s case initially was dismissed in Wake County Superior Courtroom on June 11, 2021, by Choose Michael O’Foghludha. On Oct. 18, 2024, the state Supreme Courtroom issued an unsigned, unanimous four-page ruling that gave the case new life whereas leaving open the query of whether or not the certificates of want legislation is constitutional.
The case goes again to Superior Courtroom, the place a three-judge panel appointed by Chief Justice Paul Newby will weigh the legality of the CON legislation.
A con or boon?
Relying on whom you ask, you will get two broadly diverging views on North Carolina’s Certificate of Need law.
Hospital business advocates and state regulators say such legal guidelines forestall pointless duplication of amenities, gear and companies, which theoretically cuts down on wasteful spending and ensures extra equitable entry to care. They argue that’s particularly the case in rural areas, the place sparse populations won’t be as engaging to non-public market methods which might be motivated by revenue.
For example, they are saying that amenities akin to Singleton’s would extra probably be inbuilt city areas the place potential prospects are more likely to be wealthier than in rural areas — thus concentrating companies there as a substitute of spreading them throughout the state.
Critics name CON legal guidelines a “con,” utilizing the play on phrases to explain the statutes as basically anti-competitive. They are saying such statutes disincentivize current suppliers from being environment friendly and controlling prices, arguing that free-market competitors relatively than authorities management will result in decrease affected person costs, extra selections and finally the next high quality of care.
A decrease barrier to entry, critics contend, would encourage extra suppliers to create amenities akin to Singleton’s in additional disparate locations.
These opposing views are on show in Singleton’s case.
Organizations and people who aren’t a part of the lawsuit are in search of to share their views to assist form the result of the judges’ choices.
Republican judges Jeffrey Foster of Pitt County and Troy Stafford of Iredell County are scheduled to listen to arguments with Democratic Choose Jacqueline Grant of Buncombe County on Tuesday (Nov. 18) at a Campbell Legislation College courtroom in Raleigh.
North Carolina Treasurer Brad Briner and the State Employee Association of North Carolina are in search of to intervene within the lawsuit, siding with Singleton in his problem of the CON legislation. They cite the North Carolina State Health Plan for Teachers and State Employees as their curiosity.
The plan gives well being take care of practically 750,000 present and retired state employees and their dependents, making it one of many largest purchasers of well being care within the state. For the fiscal 12 months that ended on June 30, the plan’s expenditures totaled $4.5 billion, in line with the transient filed by the treasurer and SEANC, a nonprofit group with practically 23,000 present state employees and one other 19,000 retired workers as members.
“Though the CON legislation’s acknowledged goal is to decrease healthcare prices whereas rising entry, the legislation’s precise goal is to guard institutionalized and incumbent healthcare suppliers on the expense of would-be rivals, those that want healthcare, and taxpayers,” attorneys for the treasurer and SEANC wrote within the transient.
“[T]he CON legislation successfully prohibits new suppliers from coming into the market, imposing a draconian burden,” the transient continues.
Diverse pricing
The treasurer and SEANC supplied examples of the distinction in prices for companies inside hospital settings versus freestanding facilities. Their attorneys contend:
- An MRI carried out for State Well being Plan members at a standalone radiology heart, on common, prices $872, whereas the identical process at an outpatient hospital facility prices on common $1,252 — a 44 p.c distinction.
- A colonoscopy at a freestanding heart prices on common $1,000. The identical process at an outpatient hospital facility prices, on common, $3,500 — a 250 p.c distinction.
Whereas the treasurer and SEANC acknowledge of their transient there may very well be different elements contributing to the pricing variations, they argue that they “exist partly as a result of CON legislation.”
The John Locke Foundation, a right-leaning suppose tank that advocates without spending a dime market ideas and has lengthy been a critic of certificates of want legal guidelines, expressed comparable views in its “friend-of-the-court” briefs supporting Singleton.
The state Department of Health and Human Services, its secretary, the governor and the leaders of each legislative chambers have requested the three-judge panel to dismiss Singleton’s case.
The federal authorities inspired states to undertake certificates of want legal guidelines within the Nineteen Seventies via the National Health Planning and Resources Development Act. The federal legislation advised states create their very own laws and threw in a stick by including that people who didn’t go alongside could lose federal funding for care. The fear was that with out CON regulation, states would enable the proliferation of more and more costly and probably pointless companies.
Most states complied. Later, within the Eighties, the federal authorities rolled back its laws, and 12 states instantly adopted go well with.
North Carolina is certainly one of at least 35 states which have CON legal guidelines in place, in line with the state’s Oct. 15 movement to dismiss, however these laws haven’t gone unchanged over the a long time. Since North Carolina adopted the legislation in 1977, it’s been amended 50 occasions, the movement additional states.
As just lately as 2023, the Basic Meeting modified the legislation at the side of the enlargement of Medicaid to at the very least 650,000 extra folks within the state. These adjustments eliminated certificates of want necessities for ambulatory surgical facilities within the 23 counties that had populations higher than 125,000 within the 2020 census. The modifications additionally get rid of CON evaluation for MRI gear in these counties and makes it simpler so as to add beds in some psychiatric and chemical dependency amenities.
Thorny matter
The state’s certificates of want legislation has lengthy been a supply of debate within the Basic Meeting. The discussions have run the gamut of prospects — from minor tweaks to full-fledged overhauls.
Highly effective hospital advocacy teams usually are fast to mount strategic opposition when adjustments are proposed, typically thwarting them. Federal legislation requires hospitals to treat patients with an emergency medical condition no matter their skill to pay. Hospital leaders argue that as a result of a lot of these sufferers haven’t had preventative care, they typically have extra extreme and sophisticated — and thereby costly — medical wants. Hospitals have been capable of offset the monetary burden of that uncompensated care with commercially insured sufferers and specialty companies that they contend could be eradicated by CON rollbacks.
They fear that ambulatory surgical facilities could be ready to cherry-pick sufferers, turning away those that can’t afford their companies and pushing them to hospitals which might be obligated to assist them.
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority, which does enterprise as Atrium Well being, the Cumberland County Hospital System (or Cape Worry Valley Well being System), the North Carolina Healthcare Association, the North Carolina Health Care Facilities Association, the Association for Home & Hospice Care of North Carolina, the North Carolina Senior Living Association and Bio-Medical Purposes of North Carolina filed a “pal of the courtroom” transient collectively on Nov. 5 supporting the state’s stance on the Singleton case.
The CON legislation doesn’t ban something, the well being care associations argue.
As a part of the certificates of want course of, the 25-member North Carolina State Health Coordinating Council — which incorporates licensed physicians, professors, elected officers and at the very least one member every from the state Senate and the Home of Representatives — develops an annual State Medical Amenities Plan to information methods for the state’s well being care amenities and companies. That plan is developed with alternatives for public remark and enter then forwarded to the governor for approval.
Utilizing a collection of standards established via legislation, the state well being and human companies division then critiques functions for certificates of want and provides a thumbs-up or down that may then be appealed to the state Office of Administrative Hearings. These choices might be challenged on the state Courtroom of Appeals.
Singleton’s case was totally different in that he didn’t apply for a certificates of want within the first place, as a result of the State Medical Amenities Plan confirmed no want for a brand new surgical heart in his geographical area for at the very least two years.
Sorting via analysis
North Carolina isn’t the one state seeing challenges to its certificates of want legal guidelines. Nebraska, Kentucky, West Virginia, Mississippi and Oregon have seen courtroom or legislative motion prior to now few years in search of change.
Retired Duke College economist Chris Conover argued in a 2020 research paper that certificates of want legal guidelines value the nation a whole bunch of thousands and thousands of {dollars} per 12 months whereas additionally acknowledging that the greenback estimates have been “fairly unsure provided that the literature on how CON impacts key outcomes akin to mortality and spending is sort of combined.
“The literature gives combined outcomes, on common discovering that CON will increase well being expenditures and general aged mortality whereas lowering coronary heart surgical procedure mortality,” wrote Conover and his co-author James Bailey, an economist at Windfall School. “Our cost-effectiveness evaluation estimates that the prices of CON legal guidelines considerably exceed their advantages, though our estimates are fairly unsure.”
Though the choices in Singleton’s case on his first go-’spherical in courtroom centered totally on his particular person state of affairs and narrowly tailor-made aid, the state Supreme Courtroom ruling final 12 months pushed questions of the constitutionality of the legislation right into a broader realm.
Of their request to dismiss the case, the state’s attorneys identified North Carolina Supreme Courtroom choices which have upheld the legislation. The partisan make-up of the highest courtroom has modified since then, nevertheless, transferring from a 4-3 Democratic majority in 2022 to a 5-2 Republican majority in 2023.
The present state Supreme Courtroom majority has reversed precedent set by earlier benches, creating questions in regards to the impression these dynamics could have on the North Carolina CON legislation.
“North Carolina’s certificates of want (CON) legislation bans healthcare suppliers from coming into the market and not using a CON,” Singleton’s attorneys wrote in his Oct. 15 movement for the judges to rule in his favor even earlier than a trial. “Not like an expert or facility license, a CON doesn’t regulate well being or security. As an alternative, whether or not a supplier can get hold of a CON turns fully on whether or not a state company tasks a ‘want’ for extra companies — a call that relies upon, at root, on whether or not there are already suppliers serving that area.
“Put otherwise: Whether or not a brand new supplier can enter the market is determined by whether or not outdated suppliers bought there first.”
This <a goal=”_blank” href=”https://www.northcarolinahealthnews.org/2025/11/17/nc-eye-surgeon-challenges-certificate-of-need-law/”>article</a> first appeared on <a goal=”_blank” href=”https://www.northcarolinahealthnews.org”>North Carolina Well being Information</a> and is republished right here below a <a goal=”_blank” href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/”>Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 Worldwide License</a>.<img src=”https://i0.wp.com/www.northcarolinahealthnews.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/cropped-favicon02.jpg?fit=150%2C150&ssl=1″ type=”width:1em;peak:1em;margin-left:10px;”>
<img id=”republication-tracker-tool-source” src=”https://www.northcarolinahealthnews.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=64737″ type=”width:1px;peak:1px;”><script> PARSELY = { autotrack: false, onload: perform() { PARSELY.beacon.trackPageView({ url: “https://www.northcarolinahealthnews.org/2025/11/17/nc-eye-surgeon-challenges-certificate-of-need-law/”, urlref: window.location.href }); } } </script> <script id=”parsely-cfg” src=”//cdn.parsely.com/keys/northcarolinahealthnews.org/p.js”></script>
Don't Miss the Next Big NC Trend! 🚀
Join our 'Inner Circle' newsletter for daily viral updates delivered to your inbox.
Join the Vibe NC ListSource link
